Re: [dev] [sbase / 9base] Still working on it?

From: Hugues <>
Date: Mon, 27 May 2013 21:01:51 +0200

Le 27-05-2013 20:14, Carlos Torres a écrit :
> I believe it already has what you need to replace coreutils/busybox.
> though its not just a matter or swapping stuff. you'ld have to port
> all the shell scripts that depend on gnuish stuff. i.e. anything that
> uses the auto* stuff doesn't work with 9base awk and ls... but do you
> really need stuff that uses auto* cruft?
Hum, I see. I'm not afraid of the shell.
But, you're talking about 9base, it should work better with sbase (even
if gnuish stuff is missing)?
H MoV.
Received on Mon May 27 2013 - 21:01:51 CEST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Mon May 27 2013 - 21:12:06 CEST