Re: [dev] [sbase / 9base] Still working on it?

From: Carlos Torres <vlaadbrain_AT_gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 27 May 2013 15:12:59 -0400

sbase and 9base overlap a bit on functionality. sbase is better
suited for core. though currently it seems you should layer sbase on
top of 9base to fulfill some of sbase's TODO's. get porting :)

--Carlos

On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 3:01 PM, Hugues <ypnose.ypnix_AT_mailoo.org> wrote:
> Le 27-05-2013 20:14, Carlos Torres a écrit :
>
>> I believe it already has what you need to replace coreutils/busybox.
>> though its not just a matter or swapping stuff. you'ld have to port
>> all the shell scripts that depend on gnuish stuff. i.e. anything that
>> uses the auto* stuff doesn't work with 9base awk and ls... but do you
>> really need stuff that uses auto* cruft?
>
> Hum, I see. I'm not afraid of the shell.
> But, you're talking about 9base, it should work better with sbase (even if
> gnuish stuff is missing)?
> --
> H MoV.
>
Received on Mon May 27 2013 - 21:12:59 CEST