On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 05:09:42PM -0400, Calvin Morrison wrote:
> On 14 August 2013 14:12, Roberto E. Vargas Caballero <k0ga_AT_shike2.com> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I was testing some of the tools of sbase, and after
> > trying chvt I could see that it inserts directly in the code
> > the ioctl values of linux, without including the header of
> > the linux kernel. The problem comes when you try it with other
> > operating system. You don't get any compilation problem,
> > but it doesn't work and it is really dangerous (maybe in
> > the other operating system this ioctl values do bad things).
> >
> > I think should be some control about what applications
> > are built in each plataform, or even discuss if non portable
> > applications should be in sbase.
> >
>
> IIRC portability has been discussed previously. I would look through
> the mailing archives
>
> Calvin
I'd be inclined to put this in ubase[1]. sbase should be clear of
non-portable code.
David, let me know what you think.
[1]
http://git.2f30.org/ubase
Thanks,
sin
Received on Wed Aug 14 2013 - 23:21:17 CEST