Re: tinycore - Used to be [dev] I'm back

From: Jens Staal <staal1978_AT_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 09:23:14 +0200

On Monday 21 October 2013 14:43:16 Carlos Torres wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 1:15 PM, hiro <23hiro_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
> > Yeah, tinycore's biggest failure is that it's too difficult to find
> > the right man pages of certain packages.
>
> I knew tinycore wouldn't have docs included, they say so in the website,
> heck when i create a tcz for my self, i strip the docs out too (did i
> mention that?)
>
> so then...on a separate topic is stali meant to be a distro that sucks
> at being extensible?
> or is it meant to be a distro thats simple, lean and yet extensible.
>
> maybe i'm still not "hardcore" enough...
>

If I understood it correctly it would have an "/emul" directory or similar for
legacy dynamically linked apps (most likely a (s)chroot of a regular distro
like Arch or Gentoo).
Received on Tue Oct 22 2013 - 09:23:14 CEST