> C is generally more and efficient, I suppose.
>
> On 12/12/2013 16:04, sin wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 03:42:52PM +0000, Neo Romantique wrote:
> >> Why Shell, and not C?
> >> Otherwise tool looks interesting.
> > I don't see why this has to be done in C.
> >
>
> --
> Regards,
> neo~
> http://www.inventati.org/neoromance
Actually, I don't know C but I plan to learn it in 2014.
I might consider porting it to C, for my first practise. I wrote it in mksh
because this is a wonderful shell and it's really powerful. And it's how I
learn new shell hacks (creating my stuff) :)
From Y.
Received on Thu Dec 12 2013 - 17:11:06 CET