Re: [dev] wswsh: a mksh web framework
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 05:11:06PM +0100, YpN wrote:
> > C is generally more and efficient, I suppose.
> >
> > On 12/12/2013 16:04, sin wrote:
> > > On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 03:42:52PM +0000, Neo Romantique wrote:
> > >> Why Shell, and not C?
> > >> Otherwise tool looks interesting.
> > > I don't see why this has to be done in C.
>
> Actually, I don't know C but I plan to learn it in 2014.
> I might consider porting it to C, for my first practise. I wrote it in mksh
> because this is a wonderful shell and it's really powerful. And it's how I
> learn new shell hacks (creating my stuff) :)
2014 is the year of C :)
Received on Thu Dec 12 2013 - 17:11:47 CET
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0
: Thu Dec 12 2013 - 17:24:03 CET