sin <sin_AT_2f30.org> writes:
> On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 05:11:06PM +0100, YpN wrote:
>> > C is generally more and efficient, I suppose.
>> >
>> > On 12/12/2013 16:04, sin wrote:
>> > > On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 03:42:52PM +0000, Neo Romantique wrote:
>> > >> Why Shell, and not C?
>> > >> Otherwise tool looks interesting.
>> > > I don't see why this has to be done in C.
>>
>> Actually, I don't know C but I plan to learn it in 2014.
>> I might consider porting it to C, for my first practise. I wrote it in mksh
>> because this is a wonderful shell and it's really powerful. And it's how I
>> learn new shell hacks (creating my stuff) :)
>
> 2014 is the year of C :)
No, that was year 100. 2014 is the year of MMXIV.
--
\ Troels
/\ Henriksen
Received on Thu Dec 12 2013 - 17:45:23 CET