On 18/04/2014, FRIGN <dev_AT_frign.de> wrote:
> I checked out some of them and
> the according POSIX-specification[0] and wondered how much work it
> would be to reimplement it and, of course, if there is any reason to do
> so.
Too much work, no good reason. We already have mksh.
> The main issue we are facing today are the bashisms in many
> shell-scripts, which basically override POSIX-compliance.
The main issue, actually, is that the POSIX shell language is insane [0].
> Is there any shell to recommend as suckless
rc
> [0]: http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/V3_chap02.html#tag_18
Received on Fri Apr 18 2014 - 21:25:05 CEST