Re: [dev] [GENERAL] License manifest

From: Anders Andersson <pipatron_AT_gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 23 May 2014 23:18:27 +0200

On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 6:36 PM, Nick <suckless-dev_AT_njw.me.uk> wrote:
> The ISC license[0] is simpler still, and in much nicer English,
> which I like. But MIT/X is perfectly fine too for our purposes here.
>
> 0. http://opensource.org/licenses/ISC

Is something more true in legalese if it's written in ALL CAPS?
Received on Fri May 23 2014 - 23:18:27 CEST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri May 23 2014 - 23:24:07 CEST