Re: [dev] [GENERAL] License manifest

From: Jakub Lach <jakub_lach_AT_mailplus.pl>
Date: Sat, 24 May 2014 00:39:48 +0200

Dnia 23 maja 2014 23:18 Anders Andersson <pipatron_AT_gmail.com> napisaƂ(a):

> > On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 6:36 PM, Nick <suckless-dev_AT_njw.me.uk> wrote:
> > The ISC license[0] is simpler still, and in much nicer English,
> > which I like. But MIT/X is perfectly fine too for our purposes here.
> >
> > 0. http://opensource.org/licenses/ISC
>
> Is something more true in legalese if it's written in ALL CAPS?

A way to make provisions/disclaims stand-out (nobody could say
they were hidden then) OR if some term has a specific definition
in the context of the document then it's signifies that.
Received on Sat May 24 2014 - 00:39:48 CEST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat May 24 2014 - 00:48:06 CEST