Re: [dev] [PATCH] Reorder-and-extend-glyph-attributes

From: FRIGN <>
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2014 11:51:25 +0200

On Thu, 31 Jul 2014 11:32:11 +0200
"Roberto E. Vargas Caballero" <> wrote:

> The case 26 is a bit different, because we implemented fast blinking
> with normal blinking, and he sent a patch to have a correct fast
> blinking. I have not applied it yet, but I think I am going to apply it.

I honestly have to say that I don't favor the fast-blinking-patch at
all. How often do you stumble upon blinking-tags anyway? Even if there
is a broad application of it in some program I don't know about, I'm
absolutely sure that the dependency on two blinking speeds is just

I planned on increasing my efforts to refactor the st main-loop, and
after only 10 minutes of work, I already had a fix ready for the timing-
More time spent on it now without unnecessarily bloating it up will open
the possiblity of getting rid of some cruft.



Received on Thu Jul 31 2014 - 11:51:25 CEST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Thu Jul 31 2014 - 12:00:10 CEST