Re: [dev] c++-style comments [was fsbm]
This message
: [
Message body
] [ More options (
top
,
bottom
) ]
Related messages
: [
Next message
] [
Previous message
] [
In reply to
] [
Next in thread
] [
Replies
]
Contemporary messages sorted
: [
by date
] [
by thread
] [
by subject
] [
by author
] [
by messages with attachments
]
From
: Sylvain BERTRAND <
sylware_AT_legeek.net
>
Date
: Fri, 7 Nov 2014 15:35:52 +0100
On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 10:30:20AM +0100, Silvan Jegen wrote:
> There is the
http://llvm.linuxfoundation.org/index.php/Main_Page
llvm/clang is worse than gcc as it's from the start a massive c++ kludge. At
least with gcc until its version 4.7, you can bootstrap its compilation with a
C "only" compiler.
They should add
http://tinycc.linuxfoundation.org/index.php/Main_Page
, since
tinycc has the decency to be coded in C.
:P
-- Sylvain
Received on
Fri Nov 07 2014 - 15:35:52 CET
This message
: [
Message body
]
Next message
:
Alexander Huemer: "Re: [dev] c++-style comments [was fsbm]"
Previous message
:
sin: "[PATCH] No need to call endpwent()"
In reply to
:
Silvan Jegen: "Re: [dev] c++-style comments [was fsbm]"
Next in thread
:
Alexander Huemer: "Re: [dev] c++-style comments [was fsbm]"
Reply
:
Alexander Huemer: "Re: [dev] c++-style comments [was fsbm]"
Contemporary messages sorted
: [
by date
] [
by thread
] [
by subject
] [
by author
] [
by messages with attachments
]
This archive was generated by
hypermail 2.3.0
: Fri Nov 07 2014 - 15:48:04 CET