On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 03:35:52PM +0100, Sylvain BERTRAND wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 10:30:20AM +0100, Silvan Jegen wrote:
> > There is the http://llvm.linuxfoundation.org/index.php/Main_Page
>
> llvm/clang is worse than gcc as it's from the start a massive c++ kludge. At
> least with gcc until its version 4.7, you can bootstrap its compilation with a
> C "only" compiler.
Indeed, that fact isn't nice about clang.
But besides that it is _much_ nicer than gcc in many regards.
Especially the diagnostics are great.
Also the codebase looks much more tiny, sane and not so 'grown'.
The resulting assembler is not yet on the same quality level as gcc, but
they will get there.
Kind regards,
-Alex
Received on Fri Nov 07 2014 - 16:01:28 CET