On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 04:01:28PM +0100, Alexander Huemer wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 03:35:52PM +0100, Sylvain BERTRAND wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 10:30:20AM +0100, Silvan Jegen wrote:
> > > There is the http://llvm.linuxfoundation.org/index.php/Main_Page
> >
> > llvm/clang is worse than gcc as it's from the start a massive c++ kludge. At
> > least with gcc until its version 4.7, you can bootstrap its compilation with a
> > C "only" compiler.
>
> Indeed, that fact isn't nice about clang.
That fact is a definitive nono. I would reconsidere if re-written in C.
I'm stuck with gcc 4.7.x
--
Sylvain
Received on Sat Nov 08 2014 - 00:44:12 CET