> I am personally not opposed to using yacc. Yeah I like hand-rolled
> recursive descent parsers are cool but yacc is a standard tool that
> most people are familiar with.
>
> Roberto, what do you think?
I agree with you. I think yacc is a suckless tool, and I am sure we will
have to use it for awk (we will have to implement it some day), but
I also agree that in this case is too much. A recursive descendant
parser for expr is pretty simple.
I think we can take it, because it is better to have a version made
by us. If we have time/interest in the future then we can change
the yacc parser to a recursive one.
Regards,
Received on Sat Nov 08 2014 - 08:43:51 CET
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0
: Sat Nov 08 2014 - 08:48:08 CET