Re: [dev] why avoid install?

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

From: pancake <pancake_AT_youterm.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 21:16:26 +0100

nope. it doesnt depends on anything, just libc. but its half a megabyte
of code

On 11/18/2014 08:35 PM, Wander Nauta wrote:
> On 11/18/2014 08:18 PM, pancake wrote:
>> Just read the src. Last time i saw it ... It was about 38kloc
> It also depends on glib, which is at the top of the sucks list.
>
Received on Tue Nov 18 2014 - 21:16:26 CET

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Dimitris Papastamos: "Re: [dev] [sbase][patch] clear and reorder suffix list"
Previous message: Evan Gates: "[PATCH] clear suffix list then add only .o and .c in that order to avoid use of builtin .c inference rule skipping .c.o"
In reply to: Wander Nauta: "Re: [dev] why avoid install?"
Next in thread: Wander Nauta: "Re: [dev] why avoid install?"
Reply: Wander Nauta: "Re: [dev] why avoid install?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Nov 18 2014 - 21:24:22 CET