Re: [dev] GCC situation

From: pancake <pancake_AT_youterm.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2014 23:29:07 +0100

tcc is actively maintained. i dont see a reason for forking it, see
tinycc-devel mailing at nongnu.org

this is the repo: http://repo.or.cz/w/tinycc.git


On 11/23/2014 11:20 PM, Henrique Lengler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What is the situation of GCC, is it bloated?
> I'm asking because I don't find too much on suckless site about it
> I don't have experience in any other compiler.
>
> I also found someday TCC (Tiny C compiler - bellard.org/tcc/)
> And it looks cool.
>
> The site shows the speed of it:
> Compiler Time(s) lines/second MBytes/second
> TinyCC 0.9.22 2.27 859000 29.6
> GCC 3.2 -O0 20.0 98000 3.4
>
> What they don't talk about is the speed of execution, wich I think
> is faster with gcc. But if I were create a suckless gcc I would
> probably fork TCC.
>
> So what do you think, GCC is ok? Or no?
>
> Regards,
Received on Sun Nov 23 2014 - 23:29:07 CET

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sun Nov 23 2014 - 23:36:14 CET