Re: [dev] [ii] [PATCH] keep nick synchronized with server

From: Troy Sankey <>
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 22:09:36 -0500

On 2015-01-28 14:44:52 -0500, Nico Golde wrote:
> What I think may be better would be to only set nick after a successful NICK
> message was received from the network as Truls suggests.
> Would you mind testing the attached patch?

Tested, works. Can we still make it log to the network channel, even
after a success? (1) it is positive confirmation which helps the user
understand what's going on, (2) I think if somebody wrote an ii wrapper
which depended on that message, then this change would break it, and (3)
it makes implementing an ii wrapper easier (which is something I was
intending to do).


Received on Thu Jan 29 2015 - 04:09:36 CET

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Thu Jan 29 2015 - 04:12:08 CET