Re: [dev] [st] [PATCH] Let curses do the dirty work for flash

From: Ivan Delalande <colona_AT_ycc.fr>
Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2015 00:52:09 +0100

On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 12:34:03AM +0100, Ivan Delalande wrote:
> - flash=\E[?5h\E[?5l,
> + flash=\E[?5h$<80/>\E[?5l,

By the way, I looked at other term definitions of this capability and I
noticed this interesting difference:

        vt200|vt220, similar for xterm, konsole, etc.
                flash=\E[?5h$<200/>\E[?5l
        vt330|vt340, vt400, linux-basicā€¦
                flash=\E[?5h\E[?5l$<200/>

Does anyone know why the delay is after the DECSCNM (reverse video)
reset for the second group of terms? This is rather counter-intuitiveā€¦

-- 
Ivan "Colona" Delalande
Received on Sun Feb 15 2015 - 00:52:09 CET

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sun Feb 15 2015 - 01:00:09 CET