Re: [dev] [st] [PATCH] Let curses do the dirty work for flash

From: <k0ga_AT_shike2.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2015 18:30:55 +0100

> By the way, I looked at other term definitions of this capability and I
> noticed this interesting difference:
>
> vt200|vt220, similar for xterm, konsole, etc.
> flash=\E[?5h$<200/>\E[?5l
> vt330|vt340, vt400, linux-basic…
> flash=\E[?5h\E[?5l$<200/>
>
> Does anyone know why the delay is after the DECSCNM (reverse video)
> reset for the second group of terms? This is rather counter-intuitive…

I have no idea, but I suppose is due to some strange behaviour in
the vt330|vt340.

Regards,
Received on Sun Feb 15 2015 - 18:30:55 CET

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sun Feb 15 2015 - 18:36:12 CET