Re: [dev] libutil/eprintf clarification patch (to the Evil_Bob's request)
On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 10:49:58AM +0100, Markus Teich wrote:
> FRIGN wrote:
> > I thought about this tonight and came to the conclusion that this "hack"
> > doesn't introduce too many problems.
>
> Heyho FRIGN,
>
> what do you think about making `usage(int status, char *shortargs)` an
> eprintf-like function in eprintf.c? This might clear things up for everyone.
Stop the madness!
Received on Mon Dec 21 2015 - 10:50:45 CET
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0
: Mon Dec 21 2015 - 11:00:18 CET