Re: [dev] [scc] issues with invoking

From: Mitt Green <>
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 18:57:40 +0300

> We don't want to follow all the extensions of GNU, this is for sure.
> If you try to be compatible with GCC at the end you become GCC. If
> the big project is C99 or POSIX the our target is begin able to
> compile it. If the big project is Linux/GCC,then we don't care
> (if you want gcc, you know where to find it).

Heh, suckless will end up making own kernel, so it could
be compiled with scc.

> About assembly, it is something that we didn't talk about yet,
> and it is something that we can add, and for sure, no with the
> GNU syntax.

There is no such thing as GNU syntax. gas supports both syntaxes;
AT&T is the de facto standard.
Received on Tue Apr 19 2016 - 17:57:40 CEST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Apr 19 2016 - 18:00:14 CEST