On 7 October 2016 at 16:24, Bruno Vetter <simplelife2010_AT_outlook.com> wrote:
> yes, it's tedious and I understand that it's not crucial to have the toolchain statically linked. Trying to do so also brings up a lot of questions that I cannot answer easily. For example a statically linked linker apparently does not support an lto plugin. I have no idea if that would be acceptable for a toolchain.
>
> I might just go on with the existing toolchain as you describe. Thanks much for your help.
You can give
http://ellcc.org/ a shot, apparently most parts of it are
statically linked.
I got stali partially compiled with it, though I stopped at libressl
which had some linux header problems apparently with ellcc's includes
that I haven't resolved yet. But it didn't appear too hard to be
worked around.
Cheers,
Anselm
Received on Fri Oct 07 2016 - 16:36:45 CEST