Re: [dev] Xorg implementations

From: <>
Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2017 13:40:34 +0000

On Mon, Jul 03, 2017 at 02:53:30PM +0200, hiro wrote:
> so if i'm on musl and tell gcc to link statically it should just work?
> in that case i'll try and report.

Meaning that, in theory, you can have a libc which does not require libgcc_s
(coze of pthread_cancel) with musl.

Namely, you should be able to have a "working" distro with a 'static gcc', namely
which frontend statically links libgcc_eh.a and libgcc.a _only_ and _not_

For c++ retards and sub-humans, I fear that there are some hard deps in gcc libstdc++
related to c++ threading (that would need investigation).

Received on Mon Jul 03 2017 - 15:40:34 CEST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Mon Jul 03 2017 - 15:48:25 CEST