Re: [dev] Xorg implementations

From: hiro <23hiro_AT_gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2017 17:33:14 +0200

I should, so there isn't any? I have alpine here ready and waiting...

On 7/3/17, sylvain.bertrand_AT_gmail.com <sylvain.bertrand_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 03, 2017 at 02:53:30PM +0200, hiro wrote:
>> so if i'm on musl and tell gcc to link statically it should just work?
>> in that case i'll try and report.
>
> Meaning that, in theory, you can have a libc which does not require
> libgcc_s
> (coze of pthread_cancel) with musl.
>
> Namely, you should be able to have a "working" distro with a 'static gcc',
> namely
> which frontend statically links libgcc_eh.a and libgcc.a _only_ and _not_
> libgcc_s.so.
>
> For c++ retards and sub-humans, I fear that there are some libgcc_s.so hard
> deps in gcc libstdc++
> related to c++ threading (that would need investigation).
>
> --
> Sylvain
>
>
Received on Mon Jul 03 2017 - 17:33:14 CEST