Re: [dev] less(1) replacement?

From: Anselm R Garbe <>
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2017 13:06:42 +0200

On 29 August 2017 at 12:10, <> wrote:
> following conditions: In no way a core functionality of the user level
> application should be implemented in the "interpreted" language; In no way the
> SDK of the user application must force the availability of the "interpreted"
> language to be compiled or run; the user application should have designed a
> strong interface that would allow many "interpreted" languages (or C or asm or
> whatever) to be used and not only one: usually a simple C API or a simple
> "network protocol". I would write C.

A bit OT, but there is an exception:

*just kidding*

Received on Tue Aug 29 2017 - 13:06:42 CEST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Aug 29 2017 - 13:12:15 CEST