Re: Re: [dev] [sxiv] doesn't want to be compiled
On 8 October 2017 at 10:43, Bert Münnich <ber.t_AT_posteo.de> wrote:
> Yes, I am. Unfortunately for you, I have no such plans. I rather use a
> portable make than bother to write a portable Makefile. Also,
> out-of-source builds are much harder if only using POSIX make syntax.
>
> Maybe it's better to write a new minimal BSD Makefile using bsd.prog.mk
> instead of tailoring sxiv's GNU Makefile to make it work with BSD make.
Using GNUmake is a poor choice. At least most suckless stuff builds
fine with either BSD oder GNU make.
But granted, that the cleanest solution would be to base all suckless
tools on 9base/mk instead.
BR,
Anselm
Received on Sun Oct 08 2017 - 11:14:21 CEST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0
: Sun Oct 08 2017 - 11:24:17 CEST