Re: [dev] Simpler WiFi alternatives
Страхиња Радић <contact_AT_strahinja.org> wrote:
> On 23/05/11 04:03PM, fossy_AT_dnmx.org wrote:
> <troll message full of swearwords>
Good point: if the author cares about the project presented,
why would he interleave every sentense with swearing.
> This list needs moderation ASAP, otherwise it risks turning into another
> Reddit (which, for those who might not know, is a veritable cesspool).
Agreed, [dev] is not [rant]. This was not pleasant to read.
> [shittily-put rant]{1} which [should be useful]{2}
{1} does not work well with {2}... how about rewriting this draft
sent too early into a document that you can present to the firmware,
hardware, software, and gateware developers, and antenna designers
(essential if you want a bit of range, you talked about kilometers)
you'd need to team-up with to get such a project done?
Eventually on its own repo to synthesize the infirmation about it.
Even if you end-up finding a device that matches, the research about
it can then be useful to people interested in it.
Received on Fri May 12 2023 - 14:18:22 CEST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0
: Fri May 12 2023 - 14:36:08 CEST