Re: [dwm] Fwd: Re: maximization handling

Anthony Brown --> dwm (2006-09-21 12:41:51 +0200):
> I also would like to keep the ability to maximize tiled clients. I think
> your proposed 'takewith' function could work (keeping the number of
> operations down is important) but this assumes that I always have an
> 'empty' tag available, right? This could be made part of
> config.default.h so that users are aware of this.

...and if I tag a client with this always-empty-tag to maximise it
I'll have to remember to untag it before "maximising" another client?

I often use togglemax() on tiled clients, thus I'd like to keep it;
but the side-effect Anselm described can indeed be ugly...

Cheers, Jukka

-- 
bashian roulette:
$ ((RANDOM%6)) || rm -rf ~