Re: [dwm] slock-0.2

On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 07:16:59PM +0200, Anselm R. Garbe wrote:
> Well increase the len value to say 100 and recheck, 10 * 1000 ms
> is not that much (alternatively increase the usleep() to
> usleep(100000); and recheck.
>
> Regards,
> --
> Anselm R. Garbe ><>< http://suckless.org/~arg/ ><>< GPG key: 0D73F361

Ok. usleep(100000); before grab loop works like a charm.
but using usleep(100000); inside grab loop doesn't work.
There is something strange in this world...

WBR, elide.
Received on Wed Oct 18 2006 - 21:34:59 UTC