Re: [dwm] Interesting idea by Gottox

On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 12:16:13PM +0100, Anselm R. Garbe wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 12:00:36PM +0100, Sander van Dijk wrote:
> > On 11/30/06, Anselm R. Garbe <arg_AT_suckless.org> wrote:
> > >On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 11:54:20AM +0100, Sander van Dijk wrote:
> > >> I know, but where do these windows go in the meantime? Are they on
> > >> screen, or invisible? Tagging them with the first tag the user views
> > >
> > >They are invisible until a tag is selected again. However, I
> > >think it will be rare that one untoggles all tags.
> >
> > If it'll be rare, why allow it at all? What does it provide (besides a
> > conceptually ugly cornercase)?
>
> The old behavior can be achieved through untoggling the current
> tag and then toggling another, - at least to me it feels better
> than not getting rid of the last tag if there is no view() at
> all.
>
> But I'm not sure after using this approach, if it's a good idea,
> it needs further testing, before I will finally judge about it.

Gottox, after all I think, there is no need to change anything,
except your shortcuts. I don't think that toggleview() needs the
change that an empty view is necessary. I currently test
toggleview() as it is in dwm-2.4 with swapped shortcuts, and it
works quite fine.

See attached.

-- 
 Anselm R. Garbe >< http://suckless.org/~arg/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361