Re: [dwm] OT: which or type or what else?

From: markus schnalke <meillo_AT_marmaro.de>
Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2007 14:25:53 +0100

Anselm R. Garbe <arg_AT_suckless.org> wrote:
>
> Both, type(1) and which(1) are not POSIX compliant and might be absent.
> Though I'd use which(1) if you don't want to go the way used by
> dmenu_path for instance.

Thanks to you and the others who answered.
I will use `which' now.

meillo
Received on Sun Dec 09 2007 - 14:25:38 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Engin Tola: "Re: [dwm] cycling through clients"
Previous message: Engin Tola: "Re: [dwm] Xinerama support"
In reply to: Anselm R. Garbe: "Re: [dwm] OT: which or type or what else?"
Next in thread: Jukka Salmi: "Re: [dwm] OT: which or type or what else?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Jul 13 2008 - 15:10:18 UTC