On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 08:21:36PM +0200, Antoni Grzymala wrote:
> Anselm R. Garbe dixit (2008-04-28, 20:06):
>
> > On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 04:32:47PM +0200, Tuncer Ayaz wrote:
> > > anyway, I took a look at DEFGEOMS and am not sure whether I
> > > have to fiddle with bh or something else to emulate BarOff.
> > > what's the correct way?
> >
> > DEFGEOM(nobar, 0, -bh, sw, 0, 0, sw, sh, wx, wy, mfact*ww, wh,
> > mx+mw, wy, ww-mw, wh, wx, wy, ww, wh)
>
> LOL.
>
> Sorry, I couldn't resist.
Well if DEFGEOM would only be used to hide the bar, I could
agree that it's ridiculous.
Kind regards,
-- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361Received on Mon Apr 28 2008 - 20:55:20 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Jul 13 2008 - 15:36:18 UTC