On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 8:55 PM, Anselm R. Garbe <arg_AT_suckless.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 08:21:36PM +0200, Antoni Grzymala wrote:
> > Anselm R. Garbe dixit (2008-04-28, 20:06):
> >
> > > On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 04:32:47PM +0200, Tuncer Ayaz wrote:
> > > > anyway, I took a look at DEFGEOMS and am not sure whether I
> > > > have to fiddle with bh or something else to emulate BarOff.
> > > > what's the correct way?
> > >
> > > DEFGEOM(nobar, 0, -bh, sw, 0, 0, sw, sh, wx, wy, mfact*ww, wh,
> > > mx+mw, wy, ww-mw, wh, wx, wy, ww, wh)
> >
> > LOL.
> >
> > Sorry, I couldn't resist.
>
> Well if DEFGEOM would only be used to hide the bar, I could
> agree that it's ridiculous.
I think Antoni laughed about the two-character variable name
and me applying the verb 'fiddle' to it.
Actually I had to take a look at my mail for a second
to find the funny part :)
Received on Mon Apr 28 2008 - 21:33:01 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Jul 13 2008 - 15:36:19 UTC