Re: [dwm] [patch] minor cleanups

From: Peter Hartlich <>
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 19:31:25 +0200

Just saw this discussion.

>> i've just realized that there is a problem with the patch: numlockmask
>> is modified but modifiers isn't

> Hmm, why is this a problem since modifiers is not static and
> reinitialized freshly in each grabkeys() call?

The problematic modification of numlockmask is done by grabkeys() itself.
It's easy to miss without a larger diff context.

Received on Wed Aug 20 2008 - 17:31:25 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Aug 20 2008 - 17:48:04 UTC