Re: [dwm] malloc'ed client in manage()

From: Brendan MacDonell <macdonellba_AT_gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 6 Sep 2008 18:28:35 -0400

I'm not sure I understand the point of this patch. calloc is defined
in both C89 and C99, and is both fairly generic and very widely used,
so I fail to see anything safer or more portable about this approach.
Not to mention that fact that most people prefer not to use structure
assignments...

Brendan MacDonell
Received on Sat Sep 06 2008 - 22:28:35 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: carmen r: "Re: [dwm] Asustek EEE PC 1000 Atom 1GB 40G SSD Linux Black"
Previous message: Filippo Erik Negroni: "[dwm] malloc'ed client in manage()"
In reply to: Filippo Erik Negroni: "[dwm] malloc'ed client in manage()"
Next in thread: Anselm R Garbe: "Re: [dwm] malloc'ed client in manage()"
Reply: Anselm R Garbe: "Re: [dwm] malloc'ed client in manage()"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sat Sep 06 2008 - 22:36:05 UTC