Re: [dwm] malloc'ed client in manage()

2008/9/6 Brendan MacDonell <macdonellba_AT_gmail.com>:
> I'm not sure I understand the point of this patch. calloc is defined
> in both C89 and C99, and is both fairly generic and very widely used,
> so I fail to see anything safer or more portable about this approach.
> Not to mention that fact that most people prefer not to use structure
> assignments...

I agree in this case.

Kind regards,
--Anselm
Received on Sun Sep 07 2008 - 08:36:41 UTC