On Sun, 7 Sep 2008 08:27:40 +0200
"Szabolcs Nagy" <nszabolcs_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
> On 9/7/08, Amit Uttamchandani <atu13439_AT_csun.edu> wrote:
> > Why not include the DWM wiki pages in a "doc/" directory in the source
> > tarball? It wouldn't bump up the size significantly and it would greatly
> > help a lot of users. I guess one could ask why not just go to the online
> > browse the wiki? In my case, I find that I am not online most of the time
> > and having the documentation at hand in the tarball is a great reference for
> > when I want to configure DWM.
>
> the wiki is a mercurial repository, ie. you can clone the whole wiki
> with revision history and browse it offline
>
That's a good idea.
> the wiki may change more frequently than the dwm releases
>
How about whenever the tarball is released, a snapshot of the DWM wiki.
> the wiki is huge compared to dwm ( >1MB when compressed without history)
>
> the wiki is a completely separate thing, we could include all the
> suckless tools in dwm tarball by that logic
>
I wasn't talking about the whole wiki. Just the sections pertaining to DWM. For example, under suckless.org/dwm/ only the tuorial and the customisation section can be included (don't need the manpages, screenshots, etc):
1. /tutorial.html
2. /customisation
- ./customfuncs.html
- ./font.html
- ./noapps.html
- ./noinpu.html
- ./patch_queue.html
- ./tagmask.html
- ./windows_key.html
I'm sure the above once compressed will be less than a few kilobytes.
Thanks,
Amit
Received on Sun Sep 07 2008 - 07:02:24 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Sep 07 2008 - 07:12:04 UTC