Re: [dwm] minimal communication

From: Alan Busby <thebusby_AT_thebusby.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Mar 2009 11:16:05 +0900

Just curious, what are the advantages of sic over irssi?

On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 10:48 AM, Jeremy Jay <dinkumator_AT_gmail.com> wrote:

> I'll second bitlbee, although I still use it with irssi. I do need to
> try out sic sometime though...
>
> Jeremy
>
> On Sat 07 Mar 2009 - 01:40AM, Uriel wrote:
> > Bitlbee is the only remotely sane jabber client i know of
> >
> > uriel
> >
> >
> > On 3/7/09, Scytrin dai Kinthra <scytrin_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
> > > I'm slowly migrating from irssi to sic for IRC conversations, setting
> > > up up a hotkey in dwm to popup dmenu, which feeds into sic. sic will
> > > be displayed in either the root window or a terminal. I'm still
> > > figuring out the IPC for this setup to work sanely.
> > >
> > > My question however, is anyone familiar with a jabber client similar
> > > to sic? I've looked at freetalk and mcabber. freetalk seems more CLI
> > > oriented, but I doesn't seem that piping friendly to me.
> > > mcabber uses ncurses as an interface, but already has a few howtos on
> > > sending notifications and data to text files, which means I can get
> > > notifications similar to sic. But I'd have to utilize the application
> > > itself rather than a dmenu pipe.
> > >
> > > Anyone?
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > stadik.net
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
Received on Sat Mar 07 2009 - 02:16:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sat Mar 07 2009 - 02:24:04 UTC