Re: [dwm] minimal communication

I use Bitlbee and irssi for Jabber and AIM communication.
Why do you want to use sic over irssi? I suppose you get a major simplicity
boost and you don't need scripting support, but irssi is pretty light...
Best,

--
Ian
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 9:16 PM, Alan Busby <thebusby_AT_thebusby.com> wrote:
> Just curious, what are the advantages of sic over irssi?
>
>
> On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 10:48 AM, Jeremy Jay <dinkumator_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I'll second bitlbee, although I still use it with irssi.  I do need to
>> try out sic sometime though...
>>
>> Jeremy
>>
>> On Sat 07 Mar 2009 - 01:40AM, Uriel wrote:
>> > Bitlbee is the only remotely sane jabber client i know of
>> >
>> > uriel
>> >
>> >
>> > On 3/7/09, Scytrin dai Kinthra <scytrin_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > I'm slowly migrating from irssi to sic for IRC conversations, setting
>> > >  up up a hotkey in dwm to popup dmenu, which feeds into sic. sic will
>> > >  be displayed in either the root window or a terminal. I'm still
>> > >  figuring out the IPC for this setup to work sanely.
>> > >
>> > >  My question however, is anyone familiar with a jabber client similar
>> > >  to sic? I've looked at freetalk and mcabber. freetalk seems more CLI
>> > >  oriented, but I doesn't seem that piping friendly to me.
>> > >  mcabber uses ncurses as an interface, but already has a few howtos on
>> > >  sending notifications and data to text files, which means I can get
>> > >  notifications similar to sic. But I'd have to utilize the application
>> > >  itself rather than a dmenu pipe.
>> > >
>> > >  Anyone?
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >  --
>> > >  stadik.net
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>>
>