Re: [dwm] dwm's future

From: Preben Randhol <randhol_AT_pvv.org>
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 18:57:13 +0200

On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 13:51:24 +0200
Martin Oppegaard <martin_AT_deathaven.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 11:47:19AM +0200, Preben Randhol wrote:
> > Personally I would like to have one dwm as is, and one gdwm (or some
> > better name) with more bells and whistles and dependencies.
>
> http://wmii.suckless.org/
>
> Or is Wmii dead in the water?
>

Well actually I wan't thinking of wmii as it behaves differently from
dwm.
Received on Mon Apr 27 2009 - 16:57:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Apr 27 2009 - 17:00:05 UTC