Re: [dwm] dwm's future

From: Martin Oppegaard <martin_AT_deathaven.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 23:19:11 +0200

On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 06:57:13PM +0200, Preben Randhol wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 13:51:24 +0200
> Martin Oppegaard <martin_AT_deathaven.com> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 11:47:19AM +0200, Preben Randhol wrote:
> > > Personally I would like to have one dwm as is, and one gdwm (or some
> > > better name) with more bells and whistles and dependencies.
> >
> > http://wmii.suckless.org/
> >
> > Or is Wmii dead in the water?
> >
>
> Well actually I wan't thinking of wmii as it behaves differently from
> dwm.
>
I can't even remember how Wmii feels like anymore, after changing to Dwm
less than a year ago.
Received on Mon Apr 27 2009 - 21:19:11 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Apr 27 2009 - 21:24:04 UTC