Re: [dwm] dwm's future

2009/4/29 Martin Oppegaard <martin_AT_deathaven.com>:
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 02:08:20PM +0200, Matthias-Christian Ott wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 01:05:40PM +0200, Martin Oppegaard wrote:
>> > On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 12:58:23PM +0200, Preben Randhol wrote:
>> > > On Wed, 29 Apr 2009 10:45:35 +0200
>> > > Martin Oppegaard <martin_AT_deathaven.com> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 10:35:12AM +0200, Preben Randhol wrote:
>> > > > > On Wed, 29 Apr 2009 10:25:55 +0200
>> > > > > Martin Oppegaard <martin_AT_deathaven.com> wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > > I like free software.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > But not GPL?
>> > > > >
>> > > > It's just another lock in which is getting too big.
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > > Sure, if you want to make proprietary software...
>> > >
>> > If you want to be free from wacko organisations.
>>
>> Are you sure, you know what you are talking about? At least all people I
>> know from Free Software Foundation Europe are quite friendly and really care
>> about Free Software and fight actively against proprietary software. They
>> are by no means wackos.
>
> Of course they are!  I'm just being sceptical.
>
>>
>> But as mentioned this discussion could go on and on without a result.
>>
>> > > --
>> > > Preben Randhol
>>
>> Regards,
>> Matthias-Christian
>>
>
>

All opensource license are crap, don't use any of them, keep you're
source secure by not publishing it. I mean, these guys who use open
source have apparently a very small penis.

my 2 cents.

-- 
http://gnuffy.chaotika.org - Real Community Distro