Re: [hackers] [sbase] ls: fix segfault when timestamp is negative

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

From: Quentin Rameau <quinq_AT_fifth.space>
Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2016 15:12:57 +0200

Hi Mattias,

> + if (ent->t.tv_sec < 0)
Can it be?
Could you provide me with a reproducible case?
Thanks.
Received on Sun Mar 27 2016 - 15:12:57 CEST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Dimitris Papastamos: "Re: [hackers] [ubase][PATCH] Add shred(1)"
Previous message: Mattias Andrée: "[hackers] [sbase][PATCH] shuf.1 and sort.1: reference each other under see also"
In reply to: Mattias Andrée: "[hackers] [sbase][PATCH] ls: fix segfault when timestamp is negative"
Next in thread: Mattias Andrée: "Re: [hackers] [sbase] ls: fix segfault when timestamp is negative"
Reply: Mattias Andrée: "Re: [hackers] [sbase] ls: fix segfault when timestamp is negative"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sun Mar 27 2016 - 15:24:14 CEST