Hi,
* Anselm R. Garbe <garbeam_AT_wmii.de> [2005-12-15 09:39]:
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 01:48:50PM +0100, Nico Golde wrote:
> > the default installation of 9base installs to /usr/local/9
> > What about chaning it to /usr/local/plan9? Cause the plan9
> > userland ports use this directory structure in their
> > scripts.
>
> I don't see the point mixing up plan9port with 9base, that's why
> 9base uses a different default prefix. Wether you install
> plan9port or 9base, you only need one toolchain to run the new
> scripts for wmii. 9base only provides those tools we actually
> really use in the scripts and those tools are statically linked
> in contrast to those of plan9port (which are dynamically linked
> against libc and libX11 for instance).
>
> There are some other differences between 9base and plan9port:
> - plan9port contains the source ($PLAN9/{src,include}) if
> installed somewhere, 9base doesn't
[...]
Ah good point ok, I forgot that they both include some
binaries like rc...
Regards Nico
-- Nico Golde - JAB: nion_AT_jabber.ccc.de | GPG: 0x73647CFF http://www.ngolde.de | http://www.muttng.org | http://grml.org Forget about that mouse with 3/4/5 buttons - gimme a keyboard with 103/104/105 keys!
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Jul 13 2008 - 15:59:37 UTC