On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 04:01:01PM +0200, Jani H. Lahtinen wrote:
> ext Anselm R. Garbe wrote:
>
> >Actually this was not intented as insult or something. It simply
> >gives an idea of achieving good software quality after some
> >time. Often people request features which could easily replace
> >existing features (like tags replace not only pages/workspaces,
> >they even make attach/detach/sendtopage totally deprecated,
> >apart from the 'detached clients layer' and the 'pager') - the
> >introduction of tags is a good sample how you can making
> >software more powerful due removing features.
> >
> >
> In case where features overlap, or when a new feature would be a simple
> extension of existing ones, that is a good principle.
>
> >(I recently declined(!) several patches
> >implementing icon support for the bar and in general for
> >liblitz).
> >
> >
> I personally don't want any unnecessary graphics, but some might. Would
> it be a good idea to have some place for storing such patches for those
> who might want them (and leaving it for them to get them actually
> compile)? ... or then not.
Ask Denis Grelich if he is willing to adapt his changes once
wmii-3 is released.
Regards,
-- Anselm R. Garbe ><>< www.ebrag.de ><>< GPG key: 0D73F361Received on Mon Mar 13 2006 - 15:25:55 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Jul 13 2008 - 16:01:06 UTC