Re: [wmii] Dynamicness, Window Sizes (again, sorry) and Xinerama.

From: Adrian Ratnapala <adrian.ratnapala_AT_gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2006 19:17:29 +1000

> I guess this would be nice, but it shouldn't interfere with the
> scaling mechanism; The only way to do that I think is by allowing only

Ahh, now I understand why Anselm spoke about percentages "70:30".
That's fine, but at least some of the time you will want boundaries
fixed in pixels, that's why put Xinerama in the thread title.
Received on Thu Apr 13 2006 - 11:17:34 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Anselm R. Garbe: "Re: [wmii] Dynamicness, Window Sizes (again, sorry) and Xinerama."
Previous message: Adrian Ratnapala: "Re: [wmii] Dynamicness, Window Sizes (again, sorry) and Xinerama."
In reply to: Sander van Dijk: "Re: [wmii] Dynamicness, Window Sizes (again, sorry) and Xinerama."
Next in thread: Anselm R. Garbe: "Re: [wmii] Dynamicness, Window Sizes (again, sorry) and Xinerama."
Reply: Anselm R. Garbe: "Re: [wmii] Dynamicness, Window Sizes (again, sorry) and Xinerama."

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Jul 13 2008 - 16:02:38 UTC