Re: [wmii] Dynamicness, Window Sizes (again, sorry) and Xinerama.

On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 09:30:29PM +1000, Adrian Ratnapala wrote:
> On 13/04/06, Sander van Dijk <a.h.vandijk_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 4/13/06, Adrian Ratnapala
> > > I don't get it. What does 0? And it what does /def/colwidth
> > > mean, we don't want a finite fixed width for a (theorically!)
> > > unlimited number of columns.
> >
> > Yes we do. If the number of columns allowed on the screen is not
> > limited, their width will get rounded of to 0 at some point when the
>
> Fair enough. But say the user wants his second column
> to be 40%. Does that really give us any idea what he wants
> his third and (heavens forbid!) 4th column would be. I guess
> it is a useful hack to get me my precious one big window,
> but it only deserves to go into wmii-3 if it truly is trival.

Well, just a related question: why don't you use wmii in a
multihead setup if your screens have different size? Actually I
never saw much benefit in Xinerama with different sized screens
so far.

Regards,

-- 
 Anselm R. Garbe  ><><  www.ebrag.de  ><><  GPG key: 0D73F361