Re: [wmii] Automatic destruction of views

* Sander van Dijk <a.h.vandijk_AT_gmail.com> [2006-04-21 16:03]:
>On 4/21/06, Anselm R. Garbe <garbeam_AT_wmii.de> wrote:
>> I think that we can drop auto-destroying views and doing the
>> destroy when the 'view' command is invoked instead.
>
>Being able to 'stay' on an empty view, but not being able to select a
>random empty view, is inconsistent. I'm firmly against removing the
>autodestroying of views, but if it was ever to happen, doing
> xwrite /ctl view some_nonexisting_tag
>should put you in the same situation as removing the last client of a
>tag, for consistency's sake.

I see no problem/inconsistency in allowing to selet an empty view.
Received on Fri Apr 21 2006 - 16:17:54 UTC