On Fri, May 05, 2006 at 10:15:27AM +0200, Stefan Tibus wrote:
> On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 08:47:31PM +0200, Denis Grelich wrote:
> > On the other hand, the current scheme makes me think a lot and
> > distracts me much from the work I'm doing, As I swap and move
> > a lot while working (what I think is »dynamic«), and having
> > to think whether I have to swap or to move now really makes my
> > little head hurt.
> ...I'd very much like a "do-what-I-want"-mode for my PC since years
> ;-)
>
> Move and swap are (as I already explained in some posting these
> days) very distinct actions. If people feel better calling the
> swap up/down a move, then they may just do so. However I like
> to keep the swap left/right for the sake of working speed and
> efficiency. It is NOT redundant.
Well, after this whole discussion I can live with following
compromise:
- keeping a horizontal swap for the price to remove the
shortcuts of vertical swap at least
- improving mouse-base move
Conceptually I'd also keep the up/down swapping in swap
internally, although it might be bound to move-shortcuts,
because it is nothing else than a swap from keyboard POV.
I believe that people will ask for removal of swap in a few
months, because they will drop using it like me or Sander,
after a while of settlement with column layout.
At least I will re-discuss this again.
Regards,
-- Anselm R. Garbe ><>< www.ebrag.de ><>< GPG key: 0D73F361Received on Fri May 05 2006 - 10:29:41 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Jul 13 2008 - 16:04:19 UTC